Cases 1 - 10 of 104
BURNAM v. ALLEN
as 1:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
CLEMENT CALVIN BURNAM, JR
Respondent:
DAVID ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRACCO v. OLIVER et al
as 1:2023cv00120
Petitioner:
DAVID ALLEN BRACCO
Respondent:
LONNIE OLIVER, MICHELLE HENRY and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv01055
Petitioner:
David Allen Russell
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv01056
Petitioner:
David Allen Russell
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv01057
Petitioner:
David Allen Russell
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv01050
Petitioner:
David Allen Russell
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vickers v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00223
Petitioner:
David Allen Vickers
Respondent:
United States of America
Defendant:
D Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Maruka
as 1:2021cv00557
Petitioner:
David Allen Jones
Respondent:
BOP, FCI McDowell and C. Maruka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. BOP, FCI McDowell
as 5:2021cv00172
Petitioner:
David Allen Jones
Respondent:
BOP, FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Downstate Correctional Facility
as 9:2021cv01088
Petitioner:
David Moore and David Allen Moore
Respondent:
Downstate Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
