Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Benton v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
as 2:2023cv06055
Plaintiff:
David Benton
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Benton et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2022cv04994
Plaintiff:
David Benton and Terry Benton
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. David Benton
as 20-14140
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID BENTON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BENTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv90783
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BENTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHANKLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56869
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BENTON SHANKLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marchbanks et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2020cv10322
Plaintiff:
Mary P. Alexander, Keyanna Tims, J. B. and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Leo A. Daly Company, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv09830
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BENTON v. USA
as 3:2018cv00036
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
DAVID BENTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Trent v. Gillemwater et al
as 2:2017mc00009
Plaintiff:
Walter Leon Trent
Defendant:
Chad Gillemwater, David Benton, Jeff Hilton and others
Trent v. Gillemwater et al
as 2:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
Walter Leon Trent
Defendant:
Chad Gillemwater, David Benton, Jeff Hilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
