Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Capps v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05645
Plaintiff:
David Capps
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FARMER v. HAMMOND POLICE et al
as 1:2021cv01636
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH S. FARMER
Defendant:
CHRISTISON, ANTHONY ADAMS, DANIAL MITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CREECH, JR. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv12979
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
DAVID CAPPS CREECH, JR.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAPPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv55798
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CAPPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capps v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2018cv00361
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
David Capps
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cantu v. US Department of Justice et al
as 3:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cantu, Sr
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Designation Sentencing Computation Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheneman v. DeGuilio et al
as 3:2016cv00321
Plaintiff:
Jeremie Sheneman
Defendant:
Jon E DeGuilio, James Moody, David Capp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHENEMAN v. DEGUILIO et al
as 2:2016cv00163
Defendant:
JESSE BARRETT, BARBARA BROOK, DAVID CAPP and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMIE SHENEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SHENEMAN v. BROOK et al
as 1:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHENEMAN
Defendant:
BARBARA BROOK, JESSE BARRETT, DAVID CAPP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheneman v. United States of America et al
as 3:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jeremie Sheneman
Defendant:
United States of America, Jon E DeGuilio, David Capp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
