Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Baker v. The City of Jackson et al
as 5:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Dylon Baker
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Officer Jeff Watts, Officer Brant Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marquez Perry v. Warden, Warren Correctional, et al
as 23-3517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUEZ B. PERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER DANIEL BURKE, SERGEANT JAMIE EWEN, UMC RODNEY MCINTOSH and others
Defendant:
WARDEN, WARREN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Bowen v. Dobbins
as 3:2020cv00292
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Dwight Dobbins
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Bowen
Defendant:
Dwight David Combs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
COMBS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv53187
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID COMBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mays v. Combs
as 4:2019cv00135
Plaintiff:
Morris J. Mays
Defendant:
David Combs
COMBS v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02049
Plaintiff:
DAVID COMBS
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Combs v. Noble et al
as 5:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
David Combs
Defendant:
Brent Noble, City of Jackson and Rose Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Combs v. Gary Swarthout
as 12-15433
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID COMBS
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden
David Combs v. Gary Swarthout
as 12-70096
Petitioner:
DAVID COMBS
Respondent:
GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden
Westfield Insurance Company v. The Terraces Development IH, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00420
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
The Terraces Development IH, LLC, Jefferson Development Group, Inc., The Terraces of Indian Hills Condominium Owners' Council, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
