Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
May v. City of Northport, Alabama et al
as 7:2010cv01772
Plaintiff:
Constance May
Defendant:
City of Northport, Alabama and Charles David Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acker et al v. Jayco, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07804
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Acker, Donald Acker, Donald Acker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Douglas David Cunningham, et al. v. Licoln Electric Co., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-71082
Plaintiff:
Douglas David Cunningham
Defendant:
Licoln Electric Co
JORDAN v. LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv73275
Plaintiff:
OLEN LAVOYN JORDAN, CLARENCE JACKSON ALLDREDGE, EUNICE HYDE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY, KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, BOC GROUP, INC. and others
Petitioner:
LANDY DELMAR ALDRIDGE and ROOSEVELT ALTOMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GRANT v. NORTH FLORIDA EVALUATION AND TREATMENT CENTER et al
as 1:2009cv00104
Plaintiff:
PEDRO J GRANT
Defendant:
NORTH FLORIDA EVALUATION AND TREATMENT CENTER, WILLIAM S BAXTER, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ankhenaten Ra El v. Michael Crain, et al
as 08-56122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANKHENATEN RA EL, Sui Juris
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MALONE CRAIN, I, JUAN MUNOZ, MICHAEL CRAWFORD and others
Cunningham v. Scott
as 1:2008cv01991
Plaintiff:
John David Cunningham
Defendant:
Bryan Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Felix Torres, Jr. v. The State Bar of California, et al
as 08-16257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIX TORRES, II
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, THE BAR JOURNAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
