Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Wadi et al v. Butler et al
as 2:2026cv03936
Plaintiff:
Muhammed Wadi and SHIREEN ALWADIH
Defendant:
David E Butler and GREGORY BETHEA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Butler v. Ceesay et al
as 2:2025cv01921
Plaintiff:
David D Butler
Defendant:
Alec Valencia-Gotts, Daniel Kirk, Edgar Ruvalcaba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Convisser et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00072
Defendant:
Charles L. Pinnell, Keith Ford, Michael Goff and others
Petitioner:
Claude David Convisser
Plaintiff:
Claude David Convisser and POP Diesel Africa, Inc.
Respondent:
Colette Marie Convisser, Martin Convisser and Martin Convisser Trust
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Butler et al v. Bowen et al
as 2:2024cv01071
Defendant:
John Doe, Lamelli, Jon Coers and others
Plaintiff:
David D Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Ed Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv02596
Defendant:
MHU Supervisor and Ed Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
David Keith Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Ed Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv02594
Defendant:
MHU Supervisor and Ed Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
David Keith Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2023cv02660
Petitioner:
David Armando Butler
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Hanken et al
as 2:2023cv01624
Plaintiff:
David D Butler
Defendant:
James Hanken, Calvin Cogburn and Steven Jewitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
