Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Pedigo v. Leman et al
as 4:2023cv04115
Plaintiff:
David Edmond Pedigo
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Leman, Correctional Officer Shine, Correctional Officer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-35712
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00020
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02871
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2015cv09212
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Nsacdalmerger, ca
Defendant:
Chen Bing, et al., Chen Ying, Discount-Snowboots.com and others
Cross_defendant:
Zhang Peipei
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015at00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pedigo v. Griffin et al
as 4:2014cv04138
Plaintiff:
David Edmond Pedigo
Defendant:
Griffin, Harris, Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. David Edmond
as 13-14381
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID EDMOND, a.k.a. Zodey, a.k.a. Zoedy
Greg Bailey v. Virginia High School League
as 11-2369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREG BAILEY and JENNIFER BAILEY
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL MCGEE, DAVID EDMOND, JR. and JILL EDMONDS
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA HIGH SCHOOL LEAGUE, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
