Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Abanoob Abdel-Malak et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv04783
Defendant:
Wendy Harris, Kenyl Kiya Kato, Superior Court of California County of San Bernardiono, Riverside, San Diego, Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Abanoob Abdel-Malak and Sinai Acquisitions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
COTTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv89175
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID GARY COTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv46557
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID GARY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. American National Property and Casualty Company
as 4:2020cv00115
Defendant:
American National Property and Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
David Gary, Smith Lor Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARY v. WRIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv04600
Plaintiff:
LOREN DAVID GARY
Defendant:
A. WRIGHT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and A. WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary v. Fort Myers Police Department
as 2:2019cv00427
Plaintiff:
David Gary
Defendant:
Fort Myers Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gladden v. Reigh
as 3:2019cv00099
Defendant:
Christina L. Reigh
Plaintiff:
David Gary Gladden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Genevis et al
as 1:2019cv00024
Defendant:
Rook Lawson, Stacey Oakes, David Gary and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11144
Plaintiff:
Joseph Quinones, Dennis Dawid, Gary Luciani and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Gary v. Fort Myers Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv00575
Plaintiff:
David Gary
Defendant:
Wolfgang Daniel and Fort Myers Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
