Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Gill v. USA
as 1:2020cv02204
Petitioner:
David Gill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79900
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID GILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CIEMINSKI et al v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03274
Plaintiff:
ADAM CHAMBERS, JOHN CHUKAYNE, EUGENE GROLLER and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cieminski et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02234
Plaintiff:
Adam Chambers, John Chukayne, Eugene Groller and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Hill v. Sturgis et al
as 8:2018cv03185
Defendant:
Mark Summerville, Anthony Johnson, Captain Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Douglas et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11287
Plaintiff:
Willie Douglas , Etta Douglas , Charles Shehee and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , City of Flint , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn et al v. Hewlett-Packard Financial Services Company et al
as 1:2018cv10705
Plaintiff:
Ryan Quinn and Yizhang Quinn
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Financial Services Company, Hewlett-Packard Financial Services (India) Private Limited, HP Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRANCHI v. CEMPRA, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00898
Defendant:
CEMPRA, INC., CASTLE ACQUISTION CORPORATION, GARHENG KONG and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FRANCHI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
TRAN v. CEMPRA, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00870
Plaintiff:
NHU TRAN
Defendant:
CEMPRA, INC., GARHENG KONG, DAVID ZACCARDELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
BOURNAZIAN v. FERNANDES et al
as 1:2017cv00828
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BOURNAZIAN
Defendant:
PRABHAVATHI FERNANDES, MARK HAHN, DAVID W. OLDACH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
