Cases 61 - 70 of 434
Barney Dunlap v. David Mitchell
as 22-7396
Petitioner / Appellant:
BARNEY ADRIAN DUNLAP
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent, Lanesboro Correctional Institution
Roerig v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
as 7:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell Roerig
Defendant:
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Giovann Jones v. David Mitchell
as 22-3192
Petitioner / Appellant:
GIOVANN JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID MITCHELL
McMullen v. Mitchell
as 3:2022cv03072
Petitioner:
William McMullen
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Kahl et al
as 8:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Adrian Gutierrez Martinez
Defendant:
Larry W. Kahl, Don Whitmire, Kris Boe Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Mitchell
as 3:2023cv00006
Petitioner:
LaShawn Russell
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Futch et al v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2022cv01384
Plaintiff:
Brian Futch, Jeffrey Brown, Richard Ledbetter and others
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC), Illinois Department of Central Management Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McCall v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv02569
Plaintiff:
Joshua L. McCall, Sr.
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Mitchell, Daniel L. Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv02340
Plaintiff:
Jessie Williams, Brandon Jackson and Abdul Love
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Chaplin Arnold, C. Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linsford Gill v. David Mitchell
as 22-2720
Petitioner / Appellant:
LINSFORD GILL
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID MITCHELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
