Cases 1 - 10 of 88
EDWARDS v. BISIGNANO
as 3:2026cv00131
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. EDWARDS
Defendant:
FRANK J. BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Edwards et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 4:2025cv01062
Plaintiff:
Heather Edwards and David G. Edwards
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Edwards v. Allen et al
as 2:2024cv00171
Defendant:
Patricia Joplin, Mike Allen and Tammy Allen
Plaintiff:
David Lee Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. UPS et al,.
as 2:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Edwards
Defendant:
UPS, United Parcel Services, Inc, United Parcel Service General Services Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Edwards v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2024at00554
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Edwards
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ryder v. Edwards et al
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
R. Randall Ryder, Jr.
Defendant:
David P. Edwards, DSS/DCSA and ARBA/BCMR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Scott v. STORE Capital Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv09612
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
STORE Capital Corporation, Tawn Kelley, Mary B. Fedewa and others
Bushansky v. STORE Capital Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv09533
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
STORE Capital Corporation, Jawad Ahsan, Joseph M. Donovan and others
Smith v. Store Capital Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv09451
Plaintiff:
Larry E Smith
Defendant:
STORE Capital Corporation, Tawn Kelley, Mary B Fedewa and others
Edwards et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv04304
Plaintiff:
David L Edwards and Connie S Edwards
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
