Cases 51 - 60 of 123
Ross v. Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 1:2017cv01050
Defendant:
Ralph Lauren Corporation
Plaintiff:
David Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Kreis v. Ross et al
as 3:2017cv00344
Plaintiff:
August B. Kreis, III
Defendant:
David Ross, David Johnson, Van Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv09551
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and DAVID OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitlow v. Clarke
as 1:2016cv01418
Petitioner:
David Ross Whitlow
Defendant:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Ross v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 16-31056
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES DAVID ROSS
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Sealed Unit Parts Co Inc v. Sycom Surge Inc, et al
as 16-2984
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SEALED UNIT PARTS CO INC
Defendant - Appellant:
SYCOM SURGE INC, MARK TUCKER, DAVID ROSS BRENNAN and others
Able et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv03117
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc
Plaintiff:
Nina Able , Blake Anderson , Karen Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Able et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00316
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nina Able , Blake Anderson , Karen Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: National Environmental Policy Act NEPA
Madison et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2016cv01041
Plaintiff:
Donna Madison , Timothy Craig Tetley , Kelly Carter and others
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Ross v. Vannoy et al
as 2:2016cv02568
Plaintiff:
James David Ross
Defendant:
Darrell Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
