Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Lynch v. Cartledge
as 6:2016cv03939
Petitioner:
David Roy Lynch
Respondent:
Leroy Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2015cv05091
Plaintiff:
David Roy Hill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MONGE et al v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
as 3:2015cv05853
Plaintiff:
Josue Roberto Monge , Emily Coates Monge , David Roy Mandel and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. David Roy Carter
as 15-4646
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID ROY CARTER
MONGE et al v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
as NCM/1:15-cv-00792
Plaintiff:
JOSUE ROBERTO MONGE , EMILY COATES MONGE , DAVID ROY MANDEL and others
Defendant:
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
MONGE et al v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2015cv00792
Plaintiff:
JOSUE ROBERTO MONGE , EMILY COATES MONGE , DAVID ROY MANDEL and others
Defendant:
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roy v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11269
Plaintiff:
David Roy
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Abbott v. Baker et al
as 3:2014cv00599
Petitioner:
David Roy Abbott
Respondent:
Renee Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Estate of David Roy Harrison et al
as 1:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Estate of David Roy Harrison, Unknown Heirs or Spouses of Heirs and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00083
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
