Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Abbott v. Williams, et al.
as 24-999
Petitioner:
DAVID ROY ABBOTT
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Abbott v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00328
Petitioner:
David Roy Abbott
Respondent:
Brian Williams and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Worthy v. Community Management Associates Inc.
as 2:2024cv10066
Plaintiff:
David Roy Worthy
Defendant:
Community Management Associates Inc.
David Roy Winters v. West Oaks Housing LLC et al
as 2:2023cv09892
Plaintiff:
David Roy Winters
Defendant:
West Oaks Housing LLC, West Oaks Housing Owners, West Oaks Housing General Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
David Roy Winters v. West Oaks Housing LLC et al
as 2:2023cv09808
Plaintiff:
David Roy Winters
Defendant:
West Oaks Housing LLC, West Oaks Housing Owners, David Nemanpour and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States v. David Bolinger
as 23-3043
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
David Roy Bolinger
Terrance James v. Roy Cooper
as 23-6756
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE LAMOUNT JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY COOPER, Governor, ROBERT LEE GUY, Lieutenant Governor, FORREST D. BRIDGES, Judge, Cleveland County and others
David Abbott v. Brian Williams, et al
as 23-15767
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID ROY ABBOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Abbott v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv00558
Petitioner:
David Roy Abbott
Respondent:
Brian Williams and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dinscore v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv22490
Plaintiff:
David Roy Dinscore
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Ajanta Pharma USA Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
