Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Stanley v. Morgan
as 24-30119
Plaintiff:
David Stanley
Defendant:
Scott Morgan, Wayne Griffin, Thomas Glover and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Stanley v. Morgan et al
as 6:2022cv01655
Plaintiff:
David Earl Stanley and David Stanley
Defendant:
City of Lafayette, Thomas Glover, Scott Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Brooks v. Stanley et al
as 7:2019cv00195
Defendant:
mr. David Stanley, Brunswick County, Ms. cathy lytch and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Sandra Hewett Brooks and Sandra Hewett Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00639
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brooks v. Stanley et al
as 7:2018cv00128
Defendant:
David Stanley, Patricia Myers and Cathy Lytch
Plaintiff:
Sandra Hewett Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
W. H., et al v. Olympia School District, et al
as 17-35691
Plaintiff - Appellant:
W. H., P H., individually; and as guardian for her minor daughter on behalf of P.H., J. H., individually and B. M., S A., individually; and as guardian for her minor daughter on behalf of
Defendant - Appellee:
OLYMPIA SCHOOL DISTRICT, a public corporation, JENNIFER PRIDDY, individually, FREDERICK DAVID STANLEY, individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
