Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv02021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Williams v. Paris, City of et al
as 5:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Williams
Defendant:
City of Paris , David Thompson and Jon L. Humphries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Burgess et al v. Bowers et al (TV2)
as 3:2014cv00502
Defendant:
Chuck Bowers, Wesley G. Norris, Debbie Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
William Charles Burgess and Grace V. Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Thompson Boyd Bey v. Judicial Council of California et al
as 2:2014cv03832
Plaintiff:
David Thompson Boyd Bey
Defendant:
Burbank Superior Court, Michael D. Carter, Does and others
David Thompson Boyd et al v. City of Glendale et al
as 2:2013cv01567
Plaintiff:
David Thompson Boyd and Patricia Marie Hale
Defendant:
City of Glendale, Does, Glendale City Police Department and others
THOMPSON v. WYNNEWOOD OF LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2012cv02308
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant:
WYNNEWOOD OF LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP , LOWER MERION POLICE DEPARTMENT , COLETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner et al v. Greenwood County et al
as 8:2011cv02557
Plaintiff:
Ruby Faulkner , Sallie Jones , William Faulkner and others
Defendant:
Greenwood County , Greenwood County Sheriff's Office , Tony Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Thompson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05864
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
The City of New York, Jason Soto, Sean McElligot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
