Cases 1 - 10 of 32
French v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice; LFUCG et al
as 5:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Antwon Francois French and A.I.R
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice; LFUCG, Traci H Brislin doing business as Traci Hamlin Brislin doing business as Traci Hamlin, Boyd Minnifield and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Hattie Tanner v. David Walters, et al
as 22-1963
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HATTIE TANNER
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID WATERS and DAVID A. WALTERS
Defendant:
CITY OF BATTLE CREEK, MI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-56504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-56447
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Waters v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv07682
Plaintiff:
David Waters
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waters v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2016cv01707
Plaintiff:
Bobby David Waters
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Joshua Lake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Waters v. Faulkner County Sheriff's Office
as 4:2015cv00401
Plaintiff:
David Waters
Defendant:
Faulkner County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sitestar Corporation v. Moore et al
as 2:2015cv00165
Defendant:
Alesia Asset Management LLC, Alesia Value Fund LLC, Arquitos Capital Management, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sitestar Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
