Cases 31 - 40 of 134
US v. Wright
as 21-1704
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID DAOUD WRIGHT, a/k/a Dawud Sharif Wright, a/k/a Dawud Sharif Abdul Wright, a/k/a Dawud Sharif Abdul Khaliq, a/k/a David Wright
Interested Party:
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
Kpaduwa v. UnitedHealth Group et al
as 0:2021cv01991
Plaintiff:
Linus Kpaduwa, Mark Doig, Paschal Emelue and others
Defendant:
UnitedHealth Group, Optum, Inc. and Advisory Board Company, The
Wright v. Inslee et al
as 4:2021cv05092
Defendant:
Unknown, Donald Holbrook, Cheryl Strange and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon David Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03415
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Lake, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-2183
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Lake, David Wright, Christopher Lowe and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Lake et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00386
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
James Lake, David Wright, Christopher Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
United States v. David Wright
as 20-3650
Defendant / Appellant:
David Wright
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Walker v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv07209
Defendant:
Anthony Brzeniak, Stanley Sanders, John Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
Xavier Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2020cv05059
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SWINNEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2020cv02316
Defendant:
BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN, NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY, BANK MELLI IRAN and others
Plaintiff:
KWAN JOHNSON, ROBERT CHELONE, VLADIMIR QUERALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
