Cases 1 - 10 of 100
DeYoung v. Dart et al
as 1:2026cv05522
Plaintiff:
Jarad DeYoung
Defendant:
R/Sgt. Peraino and Ofc. Garza
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Schultz v. Sarah Cooper, et al
as 26-1670
Plaintiff:
MARK A. SCHULTZ
Defendant:
SARAH COOPER, ANGELA HANSEN, SARAH L. DEYOUNG and others
Steven Brownell v. Michael Rivers, et al
as 26-1606
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A. BROWNELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL RIVERS, JASON BENZEL, Warden, DAISY CHASE and others
DeYoung v. Sheridan et al
as 2:2026cv00347
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean DeYoung
Defendant:
Jerry Sheridan, Unknown Garcia, Unknown Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deyoung v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00037
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Anita Deyoung
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
DEYOUNG v. PUNISHED 4 PROTECTING, INC.
as 1:2026cv00312
Plaintiff:
CANDICE DEYOUNG
Defendant:
PUNISHED 4 PROTECTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeYoung v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.
as 1:2026cv20167
Plaintiff:
Vandy DeYoung
Defendant:
Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PS) DeYoung v. City of Vacaville et al
as 2:2025cv03762
Plaintiff:
Norman Ross DeYoung, Jr
Defendant:
City of Vacaville, John Carli, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Steven Brownell v. Michael Rivers, et al
as 25-3240
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A. BROWNELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL RIVERS, JASON BENZEL, Warden, DAISY CHASE and others
Butron v. Village of Beaverville et al
as 2:2025cv02304
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Butron
Defendant:
Village of Beaverville, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Illinois Department of Public Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
