Cases 1 - 10 of 334
Mason v. Circuit Court of Calvert County et al
as 8:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
Demar Rynell Mason
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Calvert County, Tammy Lafferty, Mark S. Chandlee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-973
Petitioner:
DEMAR MARTINEZ, ANA QUINTANILLA MARTINEZ and EDGAR QUINTANILLA MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Richard Demar v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06758
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Demar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Demar Gardner
as 23-4724
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEMAR SHAKI GARDNER
Demar v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00795
Plaintiff:
Troy Demar
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. White et al
as 2:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Darwin L Williams
Defendant:
Dan White, C Klimper, E Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEMARS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03530
Plaintiff:
RYAN DEMARS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEMARS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22697
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CHARLES DEMARS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sibley v. Cloud County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv03179
Plaintiff:
Scott Sibley and Michael Sibley
Defendant:
Cloud County Jail, (fnu) Nevins, (fnu) Demars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khalil Dodd v. John Doe, et al
as 23-2683
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Khalil Demar Dodd
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe, Jane Doe, City of Sherburne and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
