Cases 1 - 10 of 15
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06133
Plaintiff:
DEMOND DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TAYLOR v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04686
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TAYLOR, MARIO DEBARROS, ALPHADEL MCKEE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
William Taylor, Mario Debarros, Alphadel McKee and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Davis v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2022cv00112
Petitioner:
Edward Demond Davis
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Davis v. GeoVera Specialty Insurance Co
as 2:2021cv04158
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
Cobie Demond Davis
Defendant:
GeoVera Specialty Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Handie et al
as 4:2021cv00616
Plaintiff:
Demond Davis and Ashley Munnerlyn Davis
Defendant:
Sharese Handie, Ferris McClain, Britt Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2021cv00852
Defendant:
Sergeant Evan Cox, Officer Jeffrey Crouch, Officer Michael Devezin and others
Not Classified By Court:
John Roes 1-50
Plaintiff:
Lauren E Chustz, Bilal Ali-Bey and Remingtyn A Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demond Davis v. Sharese Handie, et al
as 21-1100
Defendant / Appellee:
Birc Moreledge, Individual, Lonoke County Public Defender, Bridgette Rappold, Individual, Lonoke County DHS Supervisor, Robby Golden, Individual, Lonoke County Public Defender and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Demond Davis
Davis v. Handie et al
as 4:2020cv01432
Defendant:
J Ramm, Bridgette Rappold, Rob Berry and others
Plaintiff:
Demond Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2018cv13576
Plaintiff:
Demond Davis
Defendant:
NANCY A BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
