Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Church v. Commonwealth of Virginia, et al., et al
as 7:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
William L. A. Church
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, et al.,, Virginia Dept. of Corrections, et al, Virginia Parole Board, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Georgia Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv01374
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Respondent:
Georgia Dept. of Corrections, et al, Timothy Ward, State Board of Pardons and Paroles, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Kentucky Dept of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00466
Petitioner:
William M. Henry
Respondent:
Kentucky Dept of Corrections et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gist v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv06740
Plaintiff:
Iva Gist
Defendant:
City of New York, Dept of Corrections, et al, Said Officer on 3-11 tour, West Facility, West 17 Lower, A Side and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walston v. Sullvan et al
as 1:2016cv03662
Petitioner:
Daniel Walston
Respondent:
Ann Marie T. Sullvan and Commissioner of New York City Dept. of Correction, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. NYC Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv03196
Plaintiff:
Robert Taylor
Defendant:
NYC Dept. of Corrections et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Deboo et al
as 3:2008cv00072
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Sanders
Defendant:
Kuma Deboo, U.S. Parole Commission, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lataillade v. Dept. of Correction, et al.
as 1:2008cv02140
Plaintiff:
Catherine Lataillade
Defendant:
Dept. of Correction, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinkley v. Clarke et al
as 2:2007cv00348
Plaintiff:
James Mark Hinkley
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Washington State Dept of Corrections et al, Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
