Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Vreeland v. Onondaga County Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Elijah Q. Vreeland
Defendant:
Onondaga County Sheriff's Office, Tobias Shelly, Deputy Rapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Henry County Sheriff's Office et al
as 7:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Zachery Tyler Conner
Defendant:
Henry County Sheriff's Office, Henry County Adult Detention Center, Sheriff L. A. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scharnhorst v. Cantrell et al
as 5:2022cv05243
Plaintiff:
John William Scharnhorst, III
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Jay Cantrell, Captain Nolan Ake, Sergeant Carlos Pineda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Tony et al
as 0:2021cv60339
Defendant:
Deputy R. Rivera, Deputy H. Washington, A. Anda and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sepehry-Fard v. Lee et al
as 5:2020cv03585
Defendant:
Sheriff Laurie Smith, Adam N. Barasch, Joseph W. Guzzetta and others
Plaintiff:
Fareed Sepehry-Fard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frederick Opiyo v. H Boehm, et al
as 15-2414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK O. OPIYO
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUTY H BOEHM, DEPUTY J. DARLING and DEPUTY WEDGE
Frederick Opiyo v. H. Boehm, et al
as 15-1275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK O. OPIYO
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUTY H BOEHM, DEPUTY J. DARLING and DEPUTY WEDGE
Terry Muhammad v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv01228
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Does, Sgt. Jaen and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Muhammad
Frederick Opiyo v. H Boehm, et al
as 13-2013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK O. OPIYO
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUTY H BOEHM, DEPUTY J. DARLING and DEPUTY WEDGE
Walker v. Lewis et al
as 3:2012cv00441
Plaintiff:
Demario Walker
Defendant:
Tyrone Lewis, Mr. Matthews, Micheal Ivy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
