Cases 1 - 10 of 2,104
DERRICK v. FINAN et al
as 1:2024cv05637
Plaintiff:
OSH-SHAKKUR A. DERRICK
Defendant:
CAPTAIN THOMAS F. FINAN, SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER A. SOUTHARD and SOMERS POINT POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florence v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Florence
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Futral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tatum v. Torrealba et al
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tatum
Defendant:
Judge Shelly Torrealba, Joseph Valeriani and Christine J. Yi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. U Haul
as 4:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Derrick Wade Smith
Defendant:
U Haul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. STALLER et al
as 3:2024cv04033
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
BRANDEN STALLER, MD AMY EMRICH, ANTHONY GANGI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Lamar Hairston v. M. Lopez et al
as 5:2024cv00601
Petitioner:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Respondent:
M Lopez and G. Ephion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkhurst v. Shannon, et al
as 24-8017
Plaintiff:
DERRICK R. PARKHURST
Defendant:
AMERICA STINSON, AKA America Stinton, DAN SHANNON, Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections, MICHAEL PACHECO, Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution and others
Kirven et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Loydale Kirven, Paul A Moreno, Joseph Kanizar and others
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Guadalupe County Correctional Facility, Jacob LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IBRAHIM v. EMRICH et al
as 3:2024cv01780
Plaintiff:
YUSUF IBRAHIM
Defendant:
AMY EMRICH and DERRICK BODTMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
