Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Mangum v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 3:2011cv00047
Plaintiff:
Randy Mangum
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Crittenden County, Arkansas, Crittenden County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzgerald v. Busby et al
as 3:2010cv00237
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel L Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Dick Busby, Teressa Bonner, Shirley Babin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Busby et al
as 3:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
Rickey Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Dick Busby, Zane Boyd, Tereasa Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry et al v. Busby et al
as 3:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
Eric D Perry and Maurio Heron
Defendant:
Dick Busby, Thereasa Bonner, Zane Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moten v. Busby et al
as 3:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
Charles Moten, Jr
Defendant:
Richard Dick Busby, Zane Boyd, Terresa Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murry v. Busby et al
as 3:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
Eric Lavell Murry
Defendant:
Dick Busby , T Bonner , Zane Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzgerald v. Busby et al
as 3:2010cv00046
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel L Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Dick Busby, Teressa Bonner, Schrader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Busby et al
as 3:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott
Defendant:
Dick Busby, Zane Boyd and Teresa Bonner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin Cooper, III v. Thomas Martin, et al
as 10-1073
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Martin E. Cooper, III
Defendant - Appellant:
Thomas Martin, Individually & in Official Capacity as Investigator, Dick Busby, In Official Capacity as Sheriff of Crittenden County, Arkansas and Crittenden County, Arkansas
Fitzgerald v. Busby et al
as 3:2009cv00223
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Richard Dick Busby, Shrader, Lindsey Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
