Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Southern Poverty Law Center v. DHS, et al
as 20-5257
Defendant / Appellant:
Nathalie Asher, Acting Assistant Director, Field Operations for Enforcement and Removal Operations, in official capacity, Matthew T. Albence, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), in official capacity, Claire Trickler-McNulty, Acting Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Office of Detention Policy and Planning, in official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Southern Poverty Law Center, in its individual capacity and on behalf of its clients detained at LaSalle ICE Processing Center, Irwin County Detention Center, and Stewart Detention Center
Ammar Hachicho v. Kevin McAleenan, et al
as 19-56493
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD D. VITIELLO, in his official capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), GABRIEL VALDEZ, in his official capacity as Assistant Field Office Director, Adelanto Detention Facility, ICE, JAMES JANECKA, in his official capacity as Warden of the Adelanto Detention Facility and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMMAR YOUSSEF HACHICHO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01016
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Statewide Bonding, Inc., et al v. DHS, et al
as 19-5178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Statewide Bonding, Inc., Mike Donovan, Nexus Services, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ICE, Jody M. Prescott, in his official capacity as Associate Legal Advisor, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Ronald D. Vitiello, in his individual and official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and others
Perez-Mendez v. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al
as 2:2019cv02386
Respondent:
Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and its office of Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO), Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), ICE/ERO Director, Tennessee Field Office and others
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Perez-Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13029
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00894
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
BERGAL v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00319
Plaintiff:
GOKHAN BERGAL
Defendant:
CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAZARIY v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00317
Plaintiff:
KMET NAZARIY
Defendant:
CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALDRON v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00320
Plaintiff:
WENDELL WALDRON
Defendant:
CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
