Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Berberena v. Cook County Jail Disciplinary Hearing Board et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Saalik M Berberena
Defendant:
Cook County Jail Disciplinary Hearing Board, Cook County Jail and Cook County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Neely-Beytarik-El v. Daniel Conley, et al
as 17-2980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK D. NEELY-BEYTARIK-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL L. CONLEY, Disciplinary Hearing Screening Officer, RICHARD SIDWELL, Disciplinary Hearing Board Chairman and DAVID SMITH
GULLEY v. PLAINFIELD CORR. FACILITY
as 1:2016cv00517
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. GULLEY
Respondent:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY DISCIPLINARY HEARING BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LAWRENCE v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv00067
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATION ASST., DISCIPLINARY HEARING BOARD and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
KINNIE LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRYOR v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2015cv01765
Respondent:
DISCIPLINARY HEARING BOARD and SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
BRANDON S. PRYOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holiday v. DHO Disciplinary Hearing Board of BOP et al
as 1:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Daud Abdullah Holiday
Defendant:
DHO Disciplinary Hearing Board of BOP, T. Lane, T. O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James v. Dart et al
as 1:2012cv08773
Plaintiff:
Ned James, III
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Tony Preckwinkle, Daniel Moreci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
H B vs. Harper, et al
as 1:2012cv01010
Plaintiff:
H B
Defendant:
Sandra Harper , Steve Nunley , Tim Haney and others
Miscellaneou:
Shonna Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Box, et al
as 4:2007cv00312
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Jones
Defendant:
Terry Box, FNU Francis, FNU Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
