Cases 1 - 10 of 17,213
In re: Omar Powell
as 24-2127
Petitioner:
In re: OMAR POWELL
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY
Thomas Connelly, Jr. v. Warden Berks County Prison, et al
as 24-2099
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. CONNELLY, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN BERKS COUNTY PRISON and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
Matthew (PS) et al v. District Attorney(s)
as 1:2024cv01735
Plaintiff:
Matthew and Norris Merriweather
Defendant:
District Attorney(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Askia v. Steinhaus et al
as 6:2024cv06390
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn S. Askia
Defendant:
Robert D. Steinhaus, Robert M. Goldstein, Erie County Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PENDLETON v. TODD et al
as 2:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant:
RANDAL B. TODD, ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUDGE, STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Lauren Daly v. Superintendent Cambridge Springs SCI, et al
as 24-2070
Plaintiff:
LAUREN DALY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Waldrup v. Henderson
as 24-20273
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Lee Waldrup
Defendant:
Rand Henderson, Sheriff of Montgomery County, Paul Damico, Magistrate Judge, Modesto Rosales, Assistant District Attorney and others
v. FITZGERALD et al
as 5:2024cv00190
Defendant:
DEWAYNE RENARD FITZGERALD, STATE COURT OF BIBB COUNTY, SHARELL F LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beal v. District Attorney Alameda
as 1:2024cv03660
Petitioner:
Charles Clifton Beal
Respondent:
District Attorney Alameda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beckham v. Mecklenburg County et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Petitioner:
Dayshawn Beckham
Respondent:
Mecklenburg County, Gary L. McFadden, Ashley Nicole Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
