Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Smith v. Pettis County et al
as 2:2022cv04165
Plaintiff:
Donna Smith
Defendant:
Pettis County, Brad Anders, Sam Hargrave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cure v. Vance et al
as 4:2022cv00987
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cure, Jr
Defendant:
Ray Vance, Will Donaham, Matt Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarver v. Vance et al
as 4:2022cv00984
Plaintiff:
Jason Tarver
Defendant:
Ray Vance, Will Donaham, Matt Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Vance et al
as 4:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Scott
Defendant:
Ray Vance, Will Donaham, Matt Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sallee v. Rogers et al
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Gina Sallee
Defendant:
Blake Rogers, Tierra, Inc., Jerry Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Mays v. Bloomington Police Department et al
as 0:2020cv00568
Defendant:
Hennepin County Adult Dention Center, The City of Bloomington, Bloomington Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinds et al v. Lucca et al.
as 4:2019cv03266
Defendant:
Detective Lucca, Detective Black, Wesley Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Alexander Hinds, larry Lee hinds and Justin Alexander Lee Hinds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Norman et al
as 6:2019cv03328
Defendant:
Michael Wendt, Trista Kinder, Ashok Chada and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neal v. Malam et al
as 6:2018cv03291
Defendant:
John Doe 1-8, John Doe and Malam
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Kenney et al
as 4:2014cv03243
Defendant:
Dennis Bakewell, Fred Britten, Does 1-8 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Franklin, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
