Cases 1 - 10 of 461
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04042
Plaintiff:
Donald B. Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Private National Mortgage Assistance Company, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Donald B. Williams
Defendant:
Private National Mortgage Assistance Company, LLC, PennyMac Loan Servicing Company, Jeffrey P. Grogin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Strege v. National Nuclear Security Administration et al
as 3:2023cv00803
Plaintiff:
Adam Strege
Defendant:
National Nuclear Security Administration, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Uranium One and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Nixon et al V. Vasan et al
as 1:2023cv06914
Plaintiff:
Elsabasz M Nixon, M.N. and I.N.
Defendant:
Commisioner Ashwin Nixon, Commissioner Donald B Smith and Commissioner Ashwin Vasan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The State of Georgia v. Mark Meadows
as 23-12958
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK RANDALL MEADOWS
Amicus Curiae:
ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, AMY LEE COPELAND, SARAH R. SALDANA and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, DONALD B. AYER, JOHN J. FARMER, JR. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Manning v. Boyle et al
as 1:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Sitges Manning
Defendant:
Donald B. Boyle, Susan K. Muthart, Governor's Place Condominium Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donald Loomis v. United States
as 23-1270
Petitioner:
Donald B. Loomis
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
