Cases 1 - 10 of 49
David Bardes v. George Bush, et al
as 26-3585
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANDREW BARDES
Defendant:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH, individually, RICHARD BRUCE CHENEY, individually, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, individually and others
Bardes v. Bush et al
as 1:2025cv00661
Defendant:
George Walker Bush, Richard Bruce Cheney, Barack Hussein Obama II and others
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Bardes, r
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Donald Cook v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv07035
Defendant:
AGC Inc, 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Peel
as 25-205
Defendant:
Donald Bunker, Leroy Simmons, Donald Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00489
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Peel
as 24-3062
Defendant:
DONALD J. PEEL, Steven Wrede, Donald Billson and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Drake v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation, Walter Craig Jelinek, John C Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32576
Plaintiff:
DONALD COOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COOK v. UNION TOWNSHIP
as 2:2023cv01924
Plaintiff:
DONALD COOK
Defendant:
UNION TOWNSHIP, JOHN DOES (1-10) and ABC CORPS (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
David Bardes v. George Bush, et al
as 23-3272
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ANDREW BARDES
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH, RICHARD BRUCE CHENEY, WILLIAM HENRY GATES, III and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
