Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Donald Ray Pierre v. Tristan Pelayes et al
as 2:2026cv08910
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Pierre
Defendant:
Tristan Pelayes and Does 1-25 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Long v. Dallas Housing Authority
as 26-10669
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Long
Defendant:
Dallas Housing Authority, Pace Realty Corporation, Roscoe Property Management and others
Smith v. Day
as 26-30437
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Smith
Respondent:
Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center and Rayburn Correctional Center
Steele v. Jones et al
as 7:2026cv00573
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Steele
Defendant:
Brett Jones, Ethan Addair and Kelly Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dison, Jr. v. Reaves, et al.
as 26-4392
Plaintiff:
DONALD RAY DISON, JR.
Defendant:
R. REAVES, C/O, L. PARA, Sgt., E. SMITH, Captain and others
Hudson v. Hudson et al
as 9:2026cv00512
Plaintiff:
Delores Bryant Hudson
Defendant:
Donald Ray Hudson, Wendy Brown Hudson and Versa Higgin Kosten
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Karr v. Biden Jr et al
as 2:2026cv00239
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Karr, Jr
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden Jr, United States of America, Department of Veterans Affair and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
(PC) Dison v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations
as 1:2026cv04110
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Dison, Jr
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saucier v. Jacksonville Fla. Salvation Army et al
as 3:2026cv01423
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Saucier
Defendant:
Jacksonville Fla. Salvation Army, Major, Shame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
