Cases 21 - 30 of 124
Rodgers et al v. Doordash Inc
as 3:2023cv05564
Plaintiff:
LaVonne Rodgers and Wesley Rodgers
Defendant:
Doordash Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Randells v. Doordash, Inc., et al
as 2:2023cv01661
Not Classified By Court:
Rickey Randells, Doordash, Inc., Safeway Insurance Company of Louisiana and others
Defendant:
Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Hecox et al v. Doordash, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Ross Hecox and Reid Hecox
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-521
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats and Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae:
United States Chamber of Commerce
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-522
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc., Postmates Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats
Defendant / Appellant:
Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae:
United States Chamber of Commerce
Heath v. DoorDash, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Heath
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc. and Henry Van Fleet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Lucero v. Goldsmidt et al
as 1:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Tammy Lucero
Defendant:
William Goldsmidt and DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Lawson v. Doordash, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Leonard Lawson
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
