Cases 11 - 20 of 30,560
Hueston v. Brown et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
David E. Hueston
Respondent:
R. Brown and Dr. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Antonio Jones v. NJ Doc Central Transportation, et al
as 24-1758
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO JONES
Defendant:
NJ DOC CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION, DR. IHUOMA NWACHUKWU, M.D., DR. JAMES K. LIU, Rutgers Neurosurgeon and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hendrix v. Martuscello
as 24-1129
Plaintiff:
TROY HENDRIX
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, JOHN OR JANE DOES 6-10, members of the DOCCS SHMC as Marcy Correctional Facility, JAMES O'GORMAN, Deputy Commissioner for Correctional Facilities and others
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Wilson v. Molina et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Combs Wilson
Defendant:
C. Molina, J. Banania, B. Madrigal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Linthicum et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Josh Randall Riley
Defendant:
Lanette Linthicum, Richard Lu, Alexander Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Whatley v. Medical University of South Carolina
as 24-1373
Plaintiff:
REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY and SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II
Defendant:
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
