Cases 1 - 10 of 35
NAUGLE et al v. META PLATFORMS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
KIM NAUGLE and AFRIKA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC., DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. and WAKEMED
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Wire and Electronics Communications Act
State Of New York et al v. Donald Trump et al
as 1:2017cv05228
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Washington, State of New Mexico and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America, Donald Trump and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County (LASSMC), Service Employees International Union, African Services Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Regents of University of California et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2017cv05211
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, Former Federal Immigration and Homeland Security Officials and others
Plaintiff:
Regents of University of California, Janet Napolitano and UC Regents
Petitioner:
City of Seattle, U.S. Conference of Mayors, City of West Hollywood and others
Amicus Curiae:
Services, Immigrant Rights, and Education Network, West Contra Costa Unified School District, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Batalla Vidal, et al. v. Nielsen, et al.
as 1:2016cv04756
Defendant:
Baran, Kathy A. Baran, Kelvin Medlock and others
Plaintiff:
Batalla Vidal, Eliana Fernandez, Carolina Fung Feng and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County (LASSMC), Service Employees International Union, African Services Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Naugle et al v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv09200
Plaintiff:
Kim Naugle and Afrika Williams
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc., Duke University Health Systems, Inc. and WakeMed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re:Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1088
Petitioner:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Respondent:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and others
Interested Party:
BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION, and 36 other Higher Education Organizations, MICHAEL P. KEANE and others
Henry et al v. Brown University et al
as 1:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Sia Henry, Michael Maerlander, Brandon Piyevsky and others
Defendant:
Brown University, California Institute of Technology, University of Chicago and others
Petitioner:
United States of America and New York, State of
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Komatsu v. United States of America
as 23-95
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
United States of America, Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc., Court Security Officer Laptop and others
Ralph Johnson, et al v. NCAA, et al
as 22-8003
Respondent:
RALPH TREY JOHNSON, ndividually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, CLAUDIA RUIZ, ndividually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, JACOB WILLEBEEK-LEMAIR, ndividually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated and others
Petitioner:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, a/k/a THE NCAA, AND THE FOLLOWINGNCAA DIVISION I MEMBER SCHOOLSAS REPRESENTATIVES OF ADEFENDANT CLASS OF ALL PRIVATEAND SEMI-PUBLIC NCAA DIVISION IMEMBER SCHEDULES, LAFAYETTE COLLEGE, VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY and others
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, TULANE UNIVERSITY, PURDUE UNIVERSITY and others
Milton S. Hershey Medical Cen, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 21-5169
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Banner University Medical Center Phoenix, Hospital for Special Surgery and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
