Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Byrd et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00488
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Byrd, Derek Junior Adams, Jeffrey O'Brien Anglim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Corazon De Cristo Cano, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-56094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORAZON DE CRISTO CANO, TERRY HARDIN, CRYSTAL IRVIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
De Cristo Cano et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Corazon De Cristo Cano, Terry Hardin, Crystal Irvin and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
King v. Childress
as 2:2021cv02546
Petitioner:
Jason Dwight King
Respondent:
Warden Childress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Collier et al v. Stabus et al (PLR3)
as 2:2019cv00231
Defendant:
Samuel Jones, Andrew Cross, Joe Herron and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv25345
Plaintiff:
Mary B. King and Dwight King
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timberlake v. Scottsboro, Alabama, City of et al
as 5:2008cv01829
Plaintiff:
Nicole Timberlake
Defendant:
Scottsboro, Alabama, City of, Ralph Dawe, Mike Godfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Talley v. City of Scottsboro, Alabama et al
as 2:2007cv00323
Plaintiff:
Jesse Talley
Defendant:
City of Scottsboro, Alabama, Dwight King, Blake Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
