Cases 1 - 10 of 11
E. SAM JONES-DISTRIBUTOR, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
E. SAM JONES-DISTRIBUTOR, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Ford v. Sam et al
as 1:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dale Ford
Defendant:
E Sam, Brad Livingston, Rawn Toddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Earley et al
as 1:2016cv01180
Plaintiff:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bryant Earley, Earley Construction Co., Inc., City of Roswell, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Scott v. Sams et al
as 2:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Hazel Elizabeth Scott
Defendant:
Gregory E Sams and Karla York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
OWENS v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2015cv00460
Plaintiff:
ALBERT T OWENS, JR
Defendant:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, C COURTNEY, L BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Illinois Extension Pipeline Company LLC v. Thomas et al
as 3:2015cv03171
Plaintiff:
Illinois Extension Pipeline Company LLC
Defendant:
Jane A Thomas , Bradley D Thomas , Janelle E Sams-Thomas and others
Counter_claimant:
Sandra S Thomas , Bradley D Thomas , Sarah K Holt and others
Counter_defendant:
Illinois Extension Pipeline Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sam v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-17964
Plaintiff:
Gloria E. Sam
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Sam v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv17964
Plaintiff:
Gloria E. Sam
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moody Woodrow Tanksley v. Atascadero State Hospital Staff et al
as 2:2011cv08431
Defendant:
Atascadero State Hospital Staff, Ms P Gulliver, Mr Ed Merzoian and others
Plaintiff:
Moody Woodrow Tanksley
Capital One, N.A. v. Sam, CPA
as 4:2011cv02355
Defendant:
Mark E. Sam, CPA
Plaintiff:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
