Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fantastic Sams Franchise Corporation v. LarkSimple, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10863
Petitioner:
Fantastic Sams Franchise Corporation
Respondent:
LarkSimple, LLC and Warren E. Austin
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Spirdione v. WASHINGTON et al
as 2:2022cv11018
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Spirdione and Nicholas Spirdione
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Richard D. Russell, Noah Nagy and others
v. City of Detroit, a municipal corporation et al
as 2:2022cv10447
Defendant:
City of Detroit, a municipal corporation, Family Dollar Store Corporation, Matthew Jordan Green-Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Sherrod-Lugo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Austin v. USA
as 1:2021fp01023
Petitioner:
Chad E. Austin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
A&E Austin 1, LTD. v. Nationwide General Insurance Company
as 5:2021cv01031
Plaintiff:
A&E Austin 1, LTD.
Defendant:
Nationwide General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AUSTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv09594
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Austin v. US
as 19-1419
Respondent:
TIMOTHY STEWART, Warden, FCI Cumberland and UNITED STATES
Petitioner:
CHAD E. AUSTIN
Austin v. FCI Cumberland, Warden
as 1:2019cv00291
Respondent:
FCI Cumberland, Warden
Petitioner:
Chad E. Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harold Taylor v. Dean Borders et al
as 5:2018cv02488
Defendant:
Isaac Morales, S. Almosara, California Institution For Men and others
Plaintiff:
David M. Ziemke, Bruce Koklich, Ronald E. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
