Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Hodges v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv01956
Plaintiff:
Richard Hodges
Defendant:
Niccoelle E. Jackson and Tyneer N. Butler-Winters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anaya v. Russell et al
as 1:2023cv15445
Plaintiff:
Jesus E Anaya
Defendant:
Vaughn E Russell, K. Haynes, Niccoelle E. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. White et al
as 2:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Darwin L Williams
Defendant:
Dan White, C Klimper, E Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Gonzalez v. Fiorella et al
as 1:2023cv01359
Plaintiff:
Jaime Cesar Gonzalez
Defendant:
M Fiorella, E Jackson, K. Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. People of the State of New York et al
as 6:2023cv06526
Plaintiff:
Tasheam E. Jackson
Defendant:
People of the State of New York, District Attorney's Office of Chemung, Susan Rider-Ulacco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duvall v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv04160
Plaintiff:
John C Duvall
Defendant:
Dr. Earl D. Scott, Dr. Keith Segall, Centurion of Missouri, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. USA - 2255
as 1:2023cv01843
Petitioner:
Wayne E. Jackson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clay v. L. Lores, et al
as 1:2023cv01611
Plaintiff:
Carleous Clay
Defendant:
Central Office, L. Lores, Mrs. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Lares, et al
as 23-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLEOUS DARRELL CLAY
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. L. LARES, DR. RUDOLPH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Jackson v. Lara
as 23-40210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John E. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Lara, Christopher Matt, Michelle Kelly and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
