Cases 11 - 20 of 303
KING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13316
Plaintiff:
LEONARD E KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hillary v. GP Trans, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Tia Chlois Hillary
Defendant:
GP Trans, Inc., Glenn E. King and Oleg Zabirko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
King v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Timothy E King
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Warr, Timothy Darenski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Whitley County Jail
as 1:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Nicholas E. King
Defendant:
Whitley County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv02482
Plaintiff:
James E. King, Jr. and James King, Jr.
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
King v. Wormuth et al
as 1:2022cv00612
Plaintiff:
Theodore E. King
Defendant:
Christine Wormuth and Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. King et al
as 0:2022cv60812
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John E King, Jr. and Reba King
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
King v. Berry
as 1:2022cv00041
Petitioner:
Karl E. King
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Walter Berry
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United Specialty Insurance v. Truong
as 22-30027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant / Appellee:
Olivia Y. Truong, Richard E. King, Melchiode Marks King, L.L.C. and others
King v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., et al
as 2:2021cv02006
Plaintiff:
Glen E King
Defendant:
Anchor Darling Valve Company, A.W. Chesterton Company, Blackmer Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
