Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Clayton et al v. Lodovico et al
as 1:2017cv02086
Defendant:
Daniel R Lodovico and Joshua E Lewis
Plaintiff:
Christopher Clayton, Sr. and C.C., Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lewis v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00350
Plaintiff:
Karen E. Lewis
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Rhonda Meisner v. ZymoGenetics, Inc.
as 16-2443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RHONDA MEISNER
Defendant - Appellee:
ZYMOGENETICS INCORPORATED, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bristol Myers Squibb, Inc, ZYMOGENETICS LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Zymogenetics, Inc, BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB, INC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015hc02301
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241
Lewis et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11231
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lewis and Steven E. Lewis
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Strickland et al
as 6:2015cv01282
Plaintiff:
Jeffery E Lewis
Defendant:
Andy Strickland, Jody Taylor, David Matthew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell Price v. Town of Atlantic Beach
as 15-1212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF ATLANTIC BEACH, SC, CHIEF E. LEWIS, LT. RANDY FISHER and others
Defendant:
CHIEF RANDY RIZZO, COUNCILWOMAN CHARLENE TAYLOR, COUNCILWOMAN JOSEPHINE ISOM and others
Lewis v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv28694
Plaintiff:
Judith E. Lewis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv25308
Plaintiff:
Louise P. Lewis and Michael E. Lewis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
