Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Mustafa Wright v. N. Grannis, et al
as 14-56643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUSTAFA WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
N. GRANNIS, Chief of Appeals for CDCR, SILVA H. GARCIA, Chief Deputy Warden, E. A. CONTRERAS, Associate Warden and others
Tito Marrero v. Belmont Correctional Institut
as 14-3712
Petitioner - Appellant:
TITO E MARRERO
Respondent - Appellee:
BELMONT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Tito Marrero v. James Miraldi, et al
as 14-3190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITO E MARRERO
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MIRALDI and BETH WHITMORE
Marrero et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08596
Plaintiff:
Carmen E. Marrero and Raul Nieves Zeno
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maize v. Correct Health Jefferson LLC et al
as 2:2013cv05925
Plaintiff:
Jacoby Antwine Maize
Defendant:
Correct Health Jefferson LLC, Jean Hovet, Newell Normand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marrero v. Will et al
as 1:2013cv01991
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Dennis P. Will, Tony Cillo, Peter Gauthier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marrero v. Miraldi et al
as 1:2013cv01610
Plaintiff:
Tito E Marrero
Defendant:
James Miraldi and Beth Whitmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Daniel Paramo, et al
as 13-56004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, R. OLSON, Correctional Counselor II and E. MARRERO
Moore v. Harris et al
as 3:2013cv00975
Petitioner:
Alden Lamont Moore
Respondent:
Kamala D Harris, Williams Suglich, E Marrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marrero-Gonzalez v. USA
as 3:2013cv01314
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose E. Marrero-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
