Cases 1 - 10 of 23
BEY v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
ABJUL BEY and JAGUAR SUN OF BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION
Defendant:
JUDGE BRADLEY R. ALLEN, SR., GRAHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAW RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
E.R. v. Beaufort County School District
as 9:2022cv04482
Plaintiff:
E.R.
Defendant:
Beaufort County School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
v. Kinard et al
as 2:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Jordan Joseph Kinard
Defendant:
Lieutenant D. Leary-Williams, Ofc. E.R. Vaughn, Ofc. M. Toliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koon v. Clarke et al
as 2:2020cv00396
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Darrell Miller and E.R. Barksdale
Plaintiff:
Coley A. Koon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shearin v. Picio, Dr. et al
as 2:2020cv00278
Defendant:
E.R. VanBuskirk. M.D., Ortez, RN, Elisabeth Taurino, NP and others
Plaintiff:
Charles McCoy Shearin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayslett et al v. The Abbott Laboratories et al
as 5:2018cv00186
Defendant:
Kremers-Urban Co., Lannett Co., Inc., Mallinckrodt Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Hayslett and Jan Hayslett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mudd vs. Barksdale
as 1:2016cv00471
Petitioner:
Marvin Mudd
Respondent:
E.R Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
E.R. Shaw, Inc. v. Lee
as 1:2015cv01599
Plaintiff:
E.R. Shaw, Inc.
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071
Gregory Robinson v. The City of South Charleston
as 15-2200
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellant:
THE CITY OF SOUTH CHARLESTON, S.W. MILLER, a/k/a Steven W. Miller, E.M. PETERSON, a/k/a Eric M. Peterson and others
In re: S.W. Miller
as 15-2047
Petitioner:
In re: S.W. MILLER, a/k/a Steven Miller, E.M. PETERSON, a/k/a Eric Peterson, E.R. MOYER, a/k/a Engracio Moyer and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
