Cases 1 - 10 of 1,012
Vaughn v. The State of Arkansas / ADC
as 4:2024cv04030
Petitioner:
Walter Earnest Vaughn, III
Respondent:
The State of Arkansas / ADC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Harris v. Ceballos
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Earnest S. Harris
Defendant:
I. Ceballos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv50119
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Mr. Avery, Karen Smiddy, Mr. Bungard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogbebor v. Hardy et al
as 6:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Edosa Addley Festus Ogbebor
Defendant:
Kenneth Hardy, Tyler Daigle, Jacob Ortego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Earnest Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Laurel R. Harry, John Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. USA
as 4:2024cv00295
Petitioner:
Earnest Washington
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Vaughn v. Buchanon
as 4:2024cv04017
Plaintiff:
Walter Earnest Vaughn
Defendant:
Mickey Buchanon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earnest v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Gregory Earnest
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Attorney General, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JETT v. SMITH et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
EARNEST JETT and EARNEST JETT, JR
Defendant:
J SMITH, CHRIS FEILDER, RYISNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbee v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Travion Barbee
Defendant:
Carson Smith, Keith Earnest, Mark Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
