Cases 41 - 50 of 341
Edward Thomas v. C. Pfeiffer, et al
as 20-17472
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and C. PFEIFFER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD THOMAS
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv11949
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Paul Thomas
as 20-40770
Defendant / Appellant:
Paul Edward Thomas
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Thomas v. Stitt et al
as 5:2020cv00944
Plaintiff:
Dwain Edward Thomas
Defendant:
Steven Bickley, T Hastings Siegfried, Scott Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennifer Ann Jasmaine v. Melinda Ebson
as 20-7369
Defendant:
EDWARD THOMAS, Warden, JANE DOES 1-3, JOHN DOES 1-4 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JARON GIBBS, Correctional Officer, TIMOTHY BYRD, Correctional Officer, DAVID CRANDOL, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUANE LEROY FOX, f/k/a Jennifer Ann Jasmaine
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr et al v. People of the State of Kentucky et al
as 1:2020cv00156
Defendant:
Christopher T. Cohron, Governor Andy Beshear, People of the State of Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr., THOMAS EDWARD BURKE, JR and Thomas Edward Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Edward Thomas v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2020cv01131
Defendant:
J. Welch, Christian Pfeiffer, Elizabeth Stark and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Thomas v. C. Pfeiffer, et al
as 20-16436
Defendant / Appellee:
S. DUNCAN, RALPH DIAZ, M. ARMAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD THOMAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
