Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Moore et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04925
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kendall Moore, James Jenkins, Elizabeth Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Moore et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv08046
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kendall Moore, James Jenkins, Elizabeth Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
USA v. Smith
as 23-50619
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Edwin Ledell Smith, also known as Edwin Smith
US v. Carlos Smith, Jr.
as 22-4505
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS EDWIN SMITH, JR.
Smith, Jr v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02829
Plaintiff:
Edwin Smith, Jr
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv17047
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwin Smith v. Superintendent Pittsburgh SCI, et al
as 21-1643
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDENT PITTSBURGH SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWIN SMITH
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv20046
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30514
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY EDWIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Ryals et al
as 4:2020cv00221
Defendant:
Kevin Neal, Robert Doyal, Tim Ryals and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
