Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Davis v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11043
Plaintiff:
Eugene Davis
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Odn I Gmbh et al
as 1:2024cv01463
Defendant:
Ocyan SA, Odn I Gmbh, Odebrecht Drilling Norbe Six Gmbh and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv04001
Plaintiff:
Paul Eugene Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Melvin DavisIn re: Melvin Davis
as 23-6035
Petitioner:
In re: MELVIN EUGENE DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davis v. Negaard et al
as 1:2023cv00195
Defendant:
Jessica Purdy, Holly Negaard, Jessica Shanafelt and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
US v. Jarrod Davis
as 23-4515
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JARROD EUGENE DAVIS
Davis v. Chapman
as 2:2023cv11669
Petitioner:
Marlon Eugene Davis
Respondent:
Warden Willis Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. United States
as 6:2023cv00064
Petitioner:
Gregory Eugene Davis
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. United States
as 5:2023hc02074
Petitioner:
Gregory Eugene Davis
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Isabella, County of et al
as 1:2023cv10711
Plaintiff:
Douglas Eugene Davis
Defendant:
Isabella County, Christopher Cluley, Shawn Narragon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
