Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Debarros v. Express Employment Professionals
as 26-3250
Defendant:
ALICIA L. KURASZ, DWIGHT HAHN, JAY DIAZ and others
Plaintiff:
ELSON DEBARROS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02685
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
George et al v. Express Services Inc
as 5:2026cv02627
Plaintiff:
Devanee George
Defendant:
Express Services Inc doing business as Express Employment Professionals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Wurm v. Express Employment Professionals
as 2:2026cv13134
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wurm
Defendant:
Express Employment Professionals
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Debarros v. Express Employment Professionals et al
as 3:2026cv01397
Plaintiff:
Elson Debarros
Defendant:
Express Employment Professionals, Express Services, Inc., Jay Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv08308
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv08305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Ebstein v. Express Services, Inc et al
as 1:2026cv00221
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Ebstein
Defendant:
Express Services, Inc doing business as Express Employment Professionals and Kearfott Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
