Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Shupe v. Pima County Adult Detention Center, et al.
as 23-3600
Petitioner / Appellant:
EARL RICHARD SHUPE
Respondent / Appellee:
PIMA COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER and MARK FEIS, Adult Probation Officer
Shupe v. Pima County Adult Probation Department et al
as 4:2022cv00529
Petitioner:
Earl Richard Shupe
Respondent:
Pima County Adult Probation Department and Mark Feis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finley v. Evans
as 2:2022cv02759
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Lapedro D Finley
Defendant:
Earl Richard Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Stanfield v. Fritzlen
as 1:2022cv00921
Petitioner:
Earl Richard, Jr. and Earl Richard Stanfield, Jr.
Respondent:
Bill Fritzlen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
RICHARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65751
Plaintiff:
EARL RICHARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02776
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EARL RICHARD RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earl Cadwallader v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 20-6543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL RICHARD CADWALLADER
Defendant / Appellee:
ELIZABETH TILSON, Chief Medical Officer and KENNETH LASSITER, Director of Prisons
Cadwallader v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2019ct03320
Plaintiff:
Earl Richard Cadwallader
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter and Elizabeth Tilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Richards et al
as 3:2018cv01575
Defendant:
Richard Arnold, Joseph Patten Brown, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. Kahn et al
as 3:2017cv01956
Plaintiff:
Jayvell-Jones Washington
Defendant:
Maria Araujo Kahn, Robert Quintanilla, Jr., Ivan Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
