Cases 1 - 10 of 35
(PC) Anderson v. Baliton et al
as 2:2025cv03651
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Earl Anderson, II
Defendant:
K. Baliton, M. Hernandez, J. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson, Jr. v. Lamar County Jail et al
as 4:2025cv00108
Plaintiff:
Earl Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Lamar County Jail and Nurse Tracy LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson, Sr v. USA
as 6:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Lester Earl Anderson, Sr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05771
Plaintiff:
Arthur Earl Anderson, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12527
Plaintiff:
EARL ANDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Anderson
as 22-40169
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Lester Earl Anderson, Jr., also known as LA
Earl Anderson v. Aramark Corr Srvs
as 21-3838
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, aka Aramark Corporation
Anderson v. Aramark Corporation
as 3:2021cv00531
Plaintiff:
Earl Anderson
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Anderson v. John Hairabedian, et al
as 20-4177
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BRANDEL, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit Sergeant/Corrections Counselor-ToCI, MARSHAL KLAVINGER, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit Sergeant/Correctional Counselor, ROBERT COPELY, individually and in his/her official capacity as Lieutenant Supervisor-ToCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL ANDERSON
Anderson v. Engle
as 1:2020cv00547
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Earl Anderson
Defendant:
Kent D. Engle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
